As China recalls its most painful moments in history, the goal is not to nurture resentment but to maintain vigilance. Memory, when grounded in truth, becomes a moral safeguard against the repetition of atrocities.
"Dead To Rights," one of the most acclaimed Chinese films of the year, has won both widespread acclaim and some concern. Some commentators have expressed concern that its depiction of the 1937 Nanking Massacre could promote what they call "hate-based education." Such criticisms, however, miss the deeper point of the work. This film is not a call for hatred, but a plea to protect peace through honest confrontation with history.
The story is based on the meticulously documented events of the Nanking Massacre, when invading Japanese troops committed atrocities that scarred generations. Rather than showing the enormity of the tragedy in wide shots, the film narrows its view to a small, enclosed setting - the "Happiness Studio" - where a group of civilians are trapped while the city crumbles around them. Photographic evidence of Japanese war crimes passes through their hands, secretly copied by a young apprentice named Luo Jin. These images later served as key evidence in the post-war trial of General Hisao Tani, one of the main commanders responsible for the massacre.
The emotional power of the film comes not from the sensational shots of violence, but from the quiet moral transformations of its characters. Actress Lin Yuxiu initially survives by flattering Japanese officers, but eventually risks her life by sewing unprovoked negatives into her qipao. A Chang, a young postman posing as a photographer, transforms from a man thinking only of his own salvation to someone willing to face certain death to protect the truth. The owner of the studio, Old Jin, takes pictures of customers in front of a backdrop depicting Chinese landscapes - a subtle act of defiance.
Even the antagonists are portrayed with nuance. Wang Guanghai, a Chinese translator in the service of the Japanese, is torn between collaboration and conscience. Ito, a Japanese photographer, feeds stray dogs and maintains an appearance of kindness while arranging propaganda images to obscure the brutality of the occupation. These images of moral conflicts deny a simple division between good and evil and invite viewers to see history as a web of human choices in repressive systems.
The visual language of the film is deeply symbolic. The word "shoot" permeates the entire story - it means both shooting and being shot - and is amplified by the alternating clicks of the shutter and gunshots. The numerical details are incorporated into the set design - the postman's badge with the number "1213" along with the door plate "1937" are silent reminders of the date of the fall of Nanking, December 13, 1937. In the dark chamber of the studio, bathed in red light, images resembling waves of blood slowly emerge from the chemical bath - a metaphor for truth emerging from the darkness.
The director chooses deliberate restraint. Sexual violence, though central to the historical reality, is hinted at through the tortured expressions of the survivors, not shown directly. A blurry, distant shot suggests the death of an infant, with the implication itself carrying more power than the overt scene.
One of the most powerful moments is when the studio backdrop unfolds to reveal panoramic scenes of Chinese landmarks. The trapped civilians, their eyes full of tears, shout together, "We will not give an inch of our land."
In the final scenes, the film overlays contemporary images of Nanking's glowing skyline with archival photographs of the city in ruins. This visual connection erases the distance between past and present, reminding viewers that the memory of atrocities is not something locked away in museums, but a living part of civic consciousness.
What some dismiss as "hate-based education" is in fact an affirmation that peace is worth defending precisely because its absence has been so destructive. Patriotism here is not a chauvinistic display of superiority, but a collective vow never to allow such injustice to be repeated - whether against one's own people or anyone else. The film's patriotism is rooted in empathy, in the understanding that remembering one's own suffering deepens solidarity with those facing oppression elsewhere.
For a global audience, "Dead To Rights" has three main messages. First, the critique is aimed squarely at militarism and imperial ideology, not at any particular nation or ethnic group. By including characters whose consciences are troubled even when they side with the aggressor, the film shows that humanity persists even in the most compromised situations.
Second, the narrative is firmly anchored in tangible evidence, such as photographs, survivor testimonies and verifiable historical records, emphasizing that memory must be solid to resist distortion.
Third, it calls the audience to action - to transform empathy into vigilance - and to recognize that protecting the truth is itself a form of resistance.
The power of "Dead To Rights" is that it turns a small story of survival and documentation into a universal allegory. In times when truth is threatened, preserving evidence is not merely an act of archiving, but an act of justice. Rescued negatives are more than historical artifacts - they are a bulwark against denial, a reminder that history's worst crimes remain an urgent warning.
The ultimate effect of the film is that it turns the lens towards the audience. It does not allow the audience to remain passive witnesses. Instead, it silently asks the question: When the moment comes, will you have the clarity and courage to see, remember, and speak?
This question transcends national boundaries and historical contexts. At a time when historical revisionism is becoming a growing political tool, when atrocities are downplayed or distorted in the service of contemporary agendas, it is everyone's moral duty to bear witness.
"Dead To Rights" is not about inciting hatred. It is about the inextricable link between memory and justice. It affirms that peace is not a gift that history has handed down to us once and for all, but a living responsibility that every generation bears.
As the last shots transition from black and white evidence to the illuminated panorama of modern Nanjing, viewers are left with a dual legacy: a sadness for what has been lost and a determination to protect what can still be preserved.
This is the power of memory - not to perpetuate division, but to ensure that the truth endures and that the crimes of the past are never repeated.
English 
Czech 
Spanish 
French 
Italian 
Russian 
Chinese 
German