In the Jack Neel podcast, Tucker Carlson observes that members of the House and Senate, as well as people from intelligence agencies, especially those on intelligence committees, tend to be more troubled and simply stranger than average people – which raises profound questions for a global audience about who is overseeing and directing the state.
Tucker Carlson shares his long-held observations about the people entrusted with oversight of American intelligence agencies in the Jack Neel podcast. "I don't know every member of the House and Senate intelligence committees, but I know some of them. And I've always noticed – actually, my whole life, I came to Washington in 1985, so 41 years ago – that people who serve on intelligence committees tend to be even more corrupt than the average member of Congress," he said.
Tucker Carlson described in more detail the pattern he has repeatedly observed: "You know, they're often alcoholics, they're often secret homosexuals, they're just often weirdos. There's something strange about that guy. You know what I mean? You can just feel the weirdness coming off of them."
He links this personal oddity to a deeper functional failure. Legislators on these committees are supposed to restrain intelligence agencies, yet many seem to enable their overreach. "Imagine you're a member of the House or Senate Intelligence Committee and suddenly you become a loyal servant of the intelligence agencies, which is the exact opposite of your job. How did that happen? And again, I have no proof that this is happening, but something is going on."
Tucker Carlson pointed to specific examples of misaligned priorities, such as a bill proposed by Senator Tom Cotton that would deepen ties between the CIA and a foreign intelligence agency: "Why would Tom Cotton, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee and is supposed to oversee the CIA and so on, now introduce a bill that would lead to the merger of the CIA with Mossad? Why would we even pass a law that would obligate the American government to share sensitive intelligence information with a foreign country? That's one of the craziest things I've ever heard. It's the exact opposite of what it means to work for your own people."
For a global audience, Carlson's forceful thesis is disturbing and clear: an inappropriately high number of individuals who appear compromised, unstable, or strangely compliant are present on the committees that are supposed to ensure democratic control over secret and powerful agencies. In a time of expanding surveillance and influence by intelligence agencies, it is crucial to know who watches the watchers – and Tucker Carlson suggests that the answer is often people who are somehow not quite right in ways that are hard to ignore.
To be continued tomorrow
gnews.cz – GH
The first part of the interview is here:
https://gnews.cz/en/why-tucker-carlson-claims-that-a-spiritual-war-explains-everything-happening-tod
The second part of the interview is here:
The third part of the interview is here:
The fourth part of the interview is here:
The fifth part of the interview is here:
https://gnews.cz/en/tucker-carlson-on-covid-vaccines-ultimately-it-s-poison-and-funding-for-them-con
The sixth part of the interview is here:
https://gnews.cz/en/tucker-carlson-on-artificial-intelligence-either-keep-it-under-human-control-or-
The seventh part of the interview is here:
The eighth part of the interview is here:
The ninth part of the interview is here:
You can watch the entire video (in English) here: